D.C. Means Test Unjustly Denies Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Protection

D.C. Bankruptcy Means Test Median Income by Household | www.lee-legal.com

New Chapter 7 bankruptcy means test numbers take effect today for Chapter 7 cases filed on or after November 1, 2016. The D.C. means test numbers are obviously miscalculated and unfairly exclude bankruptcy debtors in the District of Columbia.

Since October 17, 2005, the Department of Justice has promulgated median incomes for Chapter 7 debtors. To qualify for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, you must pass the “means test,” or Official Form 122A, Statement of Your Current Monthly Income. The higher the income levels, the more people who will qualify.

Some of the information on the form comes from personal income and expenses. Much of the information, however, is culled from Census and IRS data.

These numbers are very important. The U.S. Trustee’s Office uses the official means test numbers to sort between those who qualify for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection and those who do not. To a household overwhelmed with debt, being denied a fresh start under Chapter 7 can have devastating impact.

For many years, D.C. means test numbers have belied the incontrovertible fact that raising children in the District is expensive. Or that caring for an elderly parent is expensive. Or that there are enormous differences in expenses between 2-person and 4-person households. The means test focuses on income and does not adequately reflect true household expenses.

The D.C. Means Test Numbers Are Patently Erroneous

Here’s a timeline of the changes to the D.C. means test numbers since October 17, 2005, when the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act took effect.D.C. Bankruptcy Means Test Median Income by Household | www.lee-legal.comThere are actually four lines in this graph, although there appear to be just three.

The Blue line represents a single person filing for Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Single-person household income in D.C. has increased from $38,349 in October 2005 to $51,260 today. The Yellow line, a four-person household, has experienced the most dramatic change, from $62,167 to $112,064.

But look at the Orange line, which represents a 2-person household. Wait. “What Orange line?” you say?

In fact, there is no Orange line. The 3-person household Gray line completely obscures the 2-person household Orange line. Over the past 11 years, the D.C. means test numbers for 2-person and 3-person households have been virtually the same. Take a look at the table below. The highlighted numbers are exactly the same.D.C. Bankruptcy Means Test Median Income by Household | www.lee-legal.comIn 24 out of 28 times since the bankruptcy means test took effect 11 years ago, 2-person and 3-person households in D.C. have had the same Chapter 7 cutoff. Any household making more than those amounts was prima facie precluded from filing for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection. In 82% of the total periodic adjustments by the DOJ to the D.C. means test numbers, an additional person in the household increased the Chapter 7 income allowance by exactly zero.

Perhaps even worse, 18 out of 28 of adjustments to income for a 4-person household were exactly the same as a 2-person household. That can’t be right. Probability must near zero that these differing household sizes produce the same incomes.

And remember: small changes in the means test numbers affect the eligibility for Chapter 7 for hundreds of debtors required to pass the D.C. means test. The D.C. means test numbers effectively preclude Chapter 7 protection to many otherwise worthy debtors.

The algorithm being used to calculate means test income figures for the District of Columbia requires revisiting. The same may well be true for other jurisdictions.

The Entire Means Test is Wrong

The stated purpose of the Chapter 7 means test was to force households to repay their debts based upon perceived ability. When it comes to who will qualify for Chapter 7 bankruptcy and who will not, miscalculated means test numbers add up to a serious disadvantage to discrete but easily discernible household structures. The young married couple with a child (or two). Siblings supporting an elderly parent at home. The grandmother or aunt supporting two (or three) children on her own.

The more people in a household, the higher that household’s expenses will be. But the Chapter 7 means test doesn’t properly contemplate expenses. Instead, it considers primarily income and only minimal expenses. The inequitable denial of Chapter 7 bankruptcy to households struggling with debt can be ruinous to entire family structures. The unfortunate state of the means test numbers for the District of Columbia only illustrates the futility of reducing the complexity of everyday household finances to a single, simplistic number.

About Brian V. Lee 566 Articles
Brian V. Lee provides bankruptcy, foreclosure defense, business turnaround, and litigation services to clients in the District of Columbia, Virginia, and Maryland. Brian was the Washington, D.C. state chair of the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys from 2016 to 2018.